Can I be sent back home if I don't have documentary evidence to show that I will in fact return to my country?

1. What is meant by the statement that documentary evidence is not admissible until it has been authenticated?
2. How do you prove documentary evidence?
3. What is considered illegally obtained evidence?
4. What are the two rules of admissibility for photographic and recorded evidence?
5. What are the two types of documentary evidence?
6. What is the difference between documentary evidence and real evidence?
7. Is documentary evidence real evidence?
8. How do you legally obtain evidence?
9. When can illegally obtained evidence still be admissible?
10. Can stolen items be used as evidence?
11. Can photos be used as evidence in court?
12. Can photographs be used as evidence?
13. What kind of evidence are voice recordings and photographs?

What is meant by the statement that documentary evidence is not admissible until it has been authenticated?

The statement that documentary evidence is not admissible until it has been authenticated refers to evidence not being considered admissible until proper identification of such has been properly conducted and prove that the evidence it genuine.

How do you prove documentary evidence?

In case of documentary evidence the relevancy, admissibility, proof i.e. execution of document, proof of contents (both put together is the proof) and probative value of the document will be credible and important.

What is considered illegally obtained evidence?

In the United States, the exclusionary rule is a legal rule, based on constitutional law, that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law.

What are the two rules of admissibility for photographic and recorded evidence?

What is the second rule of admissibility of photographic and recorded evidence? According to the second rule of admissibility, the photograph or recording must be a true and accurate representation of the matter depicted.

What are the two types of documentary evidence?

There are two kinds of Documentary Evidence, Primary Evidence and Secondary Evidence. Primary evidence is that which is the law requires to be given first and the Secondary Evidence is that such can be given in the absence of the Primary Evidence.

What is the difference between documentary evidence and real evidence?

Documentary evidence is the kind contained in documents. ... Real evidence ultimately is anything that can convey to the trier of fact (the judge or jury) a first-hand sense impression of certain facts in a case. For example, in a murder-for-hire trial, a witness identifies the defendant as the one who shot the victim.

Is documentary evidence real evidence?

Documentary evidence is most often considered real evidence. It is any type of evidence that helps to document the issue being discussed in the trial. For example, if the trial surrounds a breach of contract, the documentary evidence would be the actual contract that was breached.

How do you legally obtain evidence?

You may collect evidence by “discovery” or by “subpoena.” Discovery is pre-trial investigation. It allows you to get either evidence itself, or information that will lead to getting the evidence you need. There are rules for how much time you have to do things, and how many questions you can ask in a certain way.

When can illegally obtained evidence still be admissible?

Independent Source Doctrine

Evidence initially obtained during an unlawful search or seizure may later be admissible if the evidence is later obtained through a constitutionally valid search or seizure. Murray v.

Can stolen items be used as evidence?

Stolen evidence may be admissible–if it's relevant. ... Prosecutors must disclose “exculpatory evidence.” Local rules on disclosure of other evidence vary–check them out. And remember that there may be good reasons for disclosing information even when not required, if it can help the client.

Can photos be used as evidence in court?

Under the “pictorial testimony” theory, photographic evidence is admissible when a sponsoring witness can testify that it is a fair and accurate representation of the subject matter. ... It is important to note, this theory is based on the personal observation(s) of the witness.

Can photographs be used as evidence?

Thus any printed or displayed image created from these data is a copy. Consequently digital recording technology provides no original that could be produced in evidence. All that is available for use as evidence is a copy of the first, probably temporary, recording in memory, and this will be admissible as evidence.

What kind of evidence are voice recordings and photographs?

Demonstrative Evidence

It's a common and reliable kind of evidence. Examples of this kind of evidence are photographs, video and audio recordings, charts, etc.